Showing posts with label Flint Loop. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Flint Loop. Show all posts

Monday, September 19, 2011

Flint Urged to Break Ties with Detroit Water Department

The City of Flint is being urged to break ties with the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department and join the Karegnondi Water Authority.

On September 7, 2011, officials from Genesee County and the Karegnondi Water Authority met with the Flint City Council to present a report prepared by Rowe Engineering, which compared the cost of upgrading the City of Flint's Water Treatment Plant ($61.5 million) with the cost of getting its water from the KWA (not specified). 
Analysis indicates that the cost of supplying water from the Flint River on a continuous basis will be greater than the proposed KWA Raw Water Supply Contract, but less than continued supply from Detroit. 
On September 18, 2011, an Editorial in the Flint Journal urged Flint officials to "fish or cut bait" on their decision whether to continue buying water from Detroit or join the Karegnondi Water Authority. The Flint Journal recommends that Flint support the new pipeline plan.

Additional Resources:
Comment: Maybe I'm missing something, but if the City Flint will only be buying raw water from the KWA, the City will still need to make capital upgrades to its water treatment plant. No? As things stand now, Flint's WTP is a back-up to the water it buys from DWSD. Won't Flint have to make the capital improvements outlined by Rowe Engineering to bring their water treatment plant into compliance? So that it can process the raw water it receives from the KWA pipeline? If someone knows the answer to these questions, please let me know. 

For more about DWSD Update, click here

Tuesday, August 9, 2011

Report: DWSD Should Retire One or More Water Treatment Plants

A recent report by CH2M Hill, a national engineering firm, questions whether the City of Detroit (DWSD) should continue to operate all 5 of its existing water treatment plants (WTP) in light of major population losses and large projected capital improvement costs.

In a June 28, 2011 report, CH2M Hill begins by noting that DWSD currently operates 5 water treatment plants, which have a combined capacity of 1,640 million gallons per day (MGD).

Lake Huron . . . . . . .  400 MGD
Northeast  . . . . . . . . . 300 MGD
Water Works Park . . . 240 MGD
Springwells . . . . . . . . 540 MGD
Southwest . . . . . . . . . 160 MGD

Over the past 5 years, the Report notes, the maximum daily demand across the DWSD system has dropped from 1,050 MGD to 800 MGD.  This change in circumstances, according to CH2M Hill, raises 2 important questions:
  1. Is there a different way to operate the system by reducing the number of treatment plants and thereby reducing the [capital investment] CIP requirements?
  2. Are all of the transmission mains recommended in [DWSD's 50 Year] Master Plan still needed within the time frame suggested?
The CH2M Report then lays out 3 scenarios under which DWSD would retire the Southwest WTP, the Northeast WTP, or both.

CH2M Hill makes the following preliminary recommendations:
  • Northeast WTP -- "retirement of the Northeast plant is the most desireable as it is the plant with the largest capital allowance to rehabilitate the plant to an acceptable level of operation."
  • Southwest WTP -- "work on rehabilitation of the treatment trains at the Southwest plant should be put on hold until a detailed analysis of the system hydraulics can be completed." 
  • Water Works Park WTP -- "The CIP contains an amount of $24.5M for re-working the discharge piping . . . this expenditure should be put on hold until better decisions can be made with respect to the future needs of this plant."
  • Springwells WTP -- "This water treatment plant is of strategic importance to the long term operation of the DWSD transmission system. Continuing with the work related to the filter rehabilitation and pumping is important and should continue. This includes [over $442 million worth of CIP projects]."
  • Transmission Mains (NOTS and Flint Loop) -- "Base on current planning projections, all of this work [$584M] should be removed from the CIP."
The CH2M Hill Report outlines a number of other recommendations (here).

Comment: The CH2M Hill Report appears to have been published during the time period in which DWSD was evaluating the CIP, between early May and late July. It is unclear, however, whether the report was part of the decision making process. It was distributed only yesterday to attendees of a TAC Meeting.  

For more about DWSD Update, click here.

Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Detroit Water Board Approves 5 Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP)

At its July 27, 2011 meeting, the Board of Water Commissioners approved a $1.3 billion Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for 2012-2016. 

Of this amount, $740.4 million is earmarked for new construction and improvements to DWSD's water and wastewater facilities; $591 million is for projects that are already under construction.

Of the new construction funding, $422.5 million is designated for water projects, and $317.9 million is designated for wastewater projects. 


After completing this review, a Draft CIP was submitted to the Board of Water Commissioners for approval at its July meeting.

During the July 27th meeting, a number of Commissioners expressed concern about the amount and timing of information provided to suburban (wholesale) customers of the Department.
  • Commissioner Bryan Williams in particular expressed his concern that the CIP doesn't reflect current needs and that the whole process for approving capital projects should be changed radically. He recommended (i) starting the process earlier; (ii) providing a formal schedule for customer input; and (iii) circulating an original and red lined version of the CIP to show changes.
  • Commissioner James Fausone echoed those concerns, that the wholesale customer base needed more time to review DWSD's proposed spending plans.
  • Commissioner Fred Barnes reported hearing from suburban customers who hadn't seen the revised CIP and weren't involved in the process.
Deputy Director Daryl Latimer and Assistant Director James George indicated that suburban communities had been briefed about DWSD's capital spending plans through the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), and that the CIP has generally not been subject to Board approval. 

Acting Director Chris Brown requested that the Board approve the revised CIP with the condition that the Assistant Director George answer the Commissioner's remaining questions. 

The Board approved the 2012-2016 CIP on a 6-1 vote. Commissioner Williams was the lone dissent.

Comment: While we haven't had time to thoroughly compare the updated CIP with last year's version, it appears that the Springwell's Water Treatment Plant (SP-563) project has survived and will be coming out for bids shortly.  The most recent list of proposed construction contracts indicates a September, 2011 bid advertisement date.

Among the projects that appear to have lost out, both the Flint Loop and North Oakland Transmission System (NOTS) water main project appear to have been cut. There is no money allocated to the oversight contracts (CM-2017 and CM-2016), which were previously awarded. 

Additional Resources:
For more about DWSD Update, click here.

Saturday, August 29, 2009

Genesee County Withdrawal Permit Approved

On August 28, 2009, the MDEQ approved Genesee County's request to withdraw upwards of 85 million gallons per day from Lake Huron.

With an approved water withdrawal permit in hand, Genesee County can proceed with its announced plans to construct a new pipeline and water treatment plant under the auspices of the newly-formed "Karegnondi Water Authority." Approval of the withdrawal permit, may also spell doom for DWSD's Flint Loop project, which is designed to extend the DWSD system into Genesee County.

Commentary: On the other hand, having a permit in hand gives Genesee County increased bargaining leverage should it be interested in resuming talks with DWSD over sharing the cost of the Flint Loop. It appears that those discussions were active until about March (as reported here), when Genesee County submitted its water withdrawal permit application.

Right now, it will be 3-5 years of subsurface investigation, design, and construction before Genesee County will see a single gallon of water. Meanwhile, DWSD's Flint Loop project is already to proceed -- the design is complete, and a construction management contract (CS-1492) is already in place. Moreover, DWSD already has water treatment plant (Lake Huron WTP), with a current capacity of 400 million gallons per day, that was designed for expansion, and can accommodate increased water demands in excess of 1 billion gallons per day with additional pumps.

Does Genesee County really think it will save money by spending an estimated $600 million on a separate pipeline, water treatment plant, and related water transmission and distribution infrastructure? Really?

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

DWSD Opposes Genesee County Water Plans

Genesee County's ambitious plan to build its own $600 million water system is encountering push back from the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department. No surprise.

In a June 29, 2009 letter (below), Interim-Director Pam Turner lays out DWSD's opposition to Genesee County's plan. Among the objections, DWSD contends Genesee County's proposal violates the evaluation criteria in the Great Lakes Compact, because it fails to address the availability of existing water supply systems (ie., the DWSD system).

In particular, DWSD has already undertaken plans to improve the supply of drinking water to Genesee County.

Both the Flint Loop and North Oakland Transmission projects were designed to increase supply and provide redundancy for Genesee County and the City of Flint. DWSD has already spent $28.6 million designing these two projects, and awarded a construction management contract. Theses projects are "shovel ready," but require the City of Flint to sign a new 30 year contract with DWSD, particularly in light of previously reported declines in water revenue. Removing the City of Flint from the calculation of water rates would increase water rates for the remaining ratepayers at least 6%, according to DWSD's estimate.

Its also appears that Genesee County's plans caught DWSD a bit flat-footed. Ms. Turner complains that when DWSD and Genesee County met on March 10, 2009 to discuss a cost-sharing plan, Genesee County failed to mention that it had already filed its application for a withdrawal permit a month earlier.

However, Genesee County Drain Commissioner, Jeff Wright, has not been secret about his plans for constructing a new water authority, as reported here. Mr. Wright's response to Pam Turner's 8-page letter was outlined in a July 6, 2009 article in the Flint Journal (here).

The MDEQ will receive public comments on Genesee County's withdrawal application until July 15, 2009, and then is expected to make a decision by August 22, 2009. Given DWSD's opposition, a delay in MDEQ's decision is likely.


Thursday, May 28, 2009

Genesee County Applies for Lake Huron Water Permit

Despite recent talks between DWSD and Genesee County about sharing the cost of a future water system improvements, it does not appear that Genesee County has abandoned its interest in a separate water system, as discussed in an earlier posting.

Earlier this week, the Genesee County Drain Commission applied to the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) to withdraw as much as 85 million gallons of water per day from Lake Huron.
"This (85 million gallon) volume would be adequate to meet the anticipated needs of Lapeer, Genesee and Sanilac counties and the city of Flint for the next several decades," said Jeff Wright, Genesee County's drain commissioner.
DWSD officials are downplaying this development, but it does call into question whether or not DWSD can or will proceed with a major expansion of its transmission capacity into Genesee County. The Flint Loop project, announced last year, would add miles to DWSD’s water transmission capacity northwards into Genesee County. However, decreased water demand has also led to lower water and sewer revenues.

[Update: There will be a 45 day public comment period, through July 15, 2009, on Genesee County's application. There is more information at the MDEQ's website. ]


Saturday, March 14, 2009

DWSD, Genesee County Discuss Sharing Cost of Water System Improvements

Reprinted with Permission from Michigan Construction News

Dragline - Editorial Comment & News Analysis

March 13, 2009
By Guy Snyder

Keeping Things Fair

Good drinking water at a reasonable price has been fundamental for civilization for thousands of years. Arguably water, sewage control, and roads were the underpinnings of the Roman Empire. Unfortunately for the Detroit Water & Sewerage Department there are signs its regional system is beginning to crumble. This week in Flint its representatives worked hard to patch things up but we suspect the numbers aren’t in their favor.

* * *


Drops in the Barrel

Meetings were held this week between Genesee County Drain Commissioner Jeff Wright and officials from the Detroit Water & Sewerage Department. They focused on the future of the county’s drinking water, as well as the city of Flint’s. There’s been considerable displeasure expressed about DW&SD water and sewage rates, especially for its outlying communities. If you recall, even Mr. Wright complained last fall about a then newly instituted 15% price hike.

This time around the DW&SD has come up with a deal. If Genesee County will pay part of the construction cost of additional water supply lines, it will be given “special status.” This would qualify it for a major price cut — possibly as much as 50% — for water.

Yesterday the drain commissioner’s office reported it was still crunching the deal’s numbers. Even if they add up to Genesee County’s favor today, we still think the DW&SD’s critics have been making valid arguments. In the long run it may well be in the county’s best interest to opt out and build a modern water supply system of its own.

In our November 18, 2008, Dragline, we discussed Mr. Wright partnering with John P. McCulloch, water resources commissioner for Oakland County, to create a regional water planning group called the Karegnondi Water Authority. Its mission has been to investigate another water system that would not also serve Genesee and Oakland counties, along with the city of Flint, but Macomb and Lapeer counties as well.

A consultant was hired last fall but not named. It still hasn’t been named. The mystery firm was supposed to have delivered a report a couple of months ago. But we haven’t seen it. Our latest research indicates a final draft is slated for release next week. Okay, we’ll look for it. Surprisingly, the Karengnondi Water Authority has yet to establish a web site. (Does it even have a staff?) Must be the final draft is to appear on Mr. Wright’s web site. Or would it be Mr. McCulloch’s?

Don’t you love governmental transparency?

Even so, back in November the general news media was broadcasting a project estimate of $350 million for the new water supply system. The comments came anonymously from the usual “government sources.” The figure was supposed to cover a water treatment plant, 60 miles of water transmission tunnel and main, and related support facilities. The system would be designed to draw as much as 150 million gallons per day.

Genesee County had already purchased a 230 acre site with a 700 foot long shoreline on Lake Huron, north of Fisher Road, in Sanilac County. The properly had formerly been owned by Detroit Edison.

This week no money has been mentioned about what Genesee County would pay for the DW&SD’s new water supply lines. Still, the cost of the entire proposed system has been pegged at $750 million. Presumably the county would have to pay for the portion that traverses Genesee County. It wouldn’t surprise us, though, if it turned out to be a capital investment close to the entire price of a new, independent system.

If it is, participation by Mr. Wright would require a deeper plunge into Genesee County’s pocket. That’s because the cost of the Karengnondi Water Authority system mentioned above would be split by a minimum of four counties. Perhaps even five ways, if the city of Flint is included.

The decision’s not up to us. But even without looking at the DW&SD’s “offer,” if we were the Genesee County Drain Commissioner we’d be strongly motivated to reject it.

The manner in which the deal’s being presented by the general news media arouses suspicion. What may seem a favorable break on water rates today could disappear after the new DW&SD water lines are finally in the ground. We also suspect Mr. Wright and the city of Flint will find greater respect for their concerns from the Karegnondi Water Authority than they currently do from the Detroit Board of Water Commissioners.

We mentioned last fall’s 15% increase. In late January of this year the water commissioners approved wholesale rate increases averaging 8.9% for water and 2.4% for sewage for its suburban customers, including Mr. Wright. The increases are to take effect on July 1st if they win the approval of the Detroit City Council. The council was supposed to take them up yesterday but our deadline for this column closed before we could find out if it did.

In case you missed our explanation last fall, Karegnondi was the name the Petan Indians gave to Lake Huron. It was used in the first known comprehensive map of Michigan and its Great Lakes, drawn in 1656 by Nicholas Sanson, the royal geographer of France.

Michigan Construction News is published by Guy Snyder (Snytco, Inc.) every Tuesday and Friday, and provides news about upcoming construction projects, and an editorial called the "Dragline." A summary of each edition is also available to those who subscribe. Michigan Construction News is supported by advertisers and by "Friends of Michigan Construction News." I look forward to reading Guy Snyder's twice-weekly newsletter, and encourage you to read and support this valuable news resource. Click here for more information about becoming a supporter of Michigan Construction News. - Peter Cavanaugh




Sunday, March 1, 2009

Genesee County Considering Alternatives to DWSD Water Supply

The Flint News reports today that Genesee County is still studying alternatives to buying water from the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department (DWSD), even as County officials continue negotiations on a possible new 30 year contract. The principal alternative would be the construction of a separate water treatment plant, which would include placing miles of new pipeline to Lake Huron.

"County Drain Commissioner Jeff Wright and a spokesman for the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department confirmed Friday they have been and will continue talking March 10 about renewing what's been an unhappy marriage -- even as the idea of water independence gets all the attention."
"A decision has to be made by August as far as I'm concerned," said Wright, who said there's at least a 50-50 chance the county will break from Detroit and build the water line at a cost of more than $300 million.
Genesee County is one of a number of counties which are studying alternatives to buying their drinking water from the City of Detroit. Meanwhile, DWSD is proceeding with plans to add capacity to its system. The Flint Loop and North Oakland Transmission System (NOTS), would add miles of additional water main and redundancy to DWSD's drinking water transmission system.

Monday, December 1, 2008

Water Demand Drops -- May Affect Rates, DWSD Construction Plans

The Detroit Free Press reported on November 30, 2008 that a drop in the demand for water among City and Suburban users may contribute to an increase and water and sewer rates by DWSD:

"Detroit officials are expected to raise water rates 6% to 10% and sewer rates by as much as 13% to 17% next month, according to some suburban leaders who have met with the department.

"The revenue dip was enough to prompt U.S. District Judge John Feikens to schedule a hearing for Tuesday [December 2, 2008] to hear how the water department and others in the region plan to deal with it.
* * *
"Feikens, who has ordered hundreds of millions of dollars in improvements to the sewerage side of the system to bring it into compliance with the Clean Water Act, said revenue is needed to fund those projects.
"If a revenue stream is affected by a certain percentage, there are rules in the Clean Water Act that say some projects may not be economically possible," Feikens said.

"It isn't yet clear whether the revenue picture is bad enough to consider such delays, Feikens said."

Comment: This article, and Judge Fekeins' comments, appear to be a reference to several ambitious, and expensive, water transmission projects announced earlier this year by DWSD, the North Oakland Transmission and Flint Loop projects, bids for which have already been delayed once, and could be delayed into 2009.